WORD ≠ INK
Tap the color of the letters.
If “BLUE” appears in red ink, choose Red. Use the same four labeled buttons or the R, B, G, and P keys.
ViewsMeetViewsMeetWORD ≠ INK
If “BLUE” appears in red ink, choose Red. Use the same four labeled buttons or the R, B, G, and P keys.
STROOP EFFECT · IMPLEMENTATION · LIMITS
Stroop’s 1935 experiments compared reading color names and naming ink colors when word and ink information conflicted. The classic group-level result is interference: naming ink colors generally takes longer when the printed word names another color.
ViewsMeet presents one stimulus at a time and uses manual labeled buttons. It records four practice choices, eight congruent measured trials, and sixteen incongruent measured trials. The result uses accuracy and median correct response time by condition.
A condition difference subtracts two estimates, and individual-difference reliability can be weak even when an average experimental effect replicates. Language, color perception, reading fluency, input method, device timing, practice, and momentary conditions all matter.
The task requires distinguishing red, blue, green, and purple ink. Labeled answer buttons help with responding but do not remove the color-perception requirement. Do not use it when that requirement is unsuitable.
This short browser demonstration cannot diagnose ADHD, dementia, neurological disease, impairment, reading problems, or executive-control ability. It also cannot establish change from one run without a controlled repeated-measures design.